Archive

Archive for the ‘Urban Land Institute’ Category

Gen Y and Housing: What They Want and Where They Want It

May 19, 2015 Comments off

Gen Y and Housing: What They Want and Where They Want It
Source: Urban Land Institute

Contrary to popular belief, most Millennials are not living the high life in the downtowns of large cities, but rather are living in less centrally located but more affordable neighborhoods, making ends meet with jobs for which many feel overqualified, and living with parents or roommates to save money, according to a new report from ULI. Still, despite their current lifestyle constraints, most are optimistic about the odds for improving their housing and financial circumstances in the years ahead.

Building Healthy Places Toolkit: Strategies for Enhancing Health in the Built Environment

April 9, 2015 Comments off

Building Healthy Places Toolkit: Strategies for Enhancing Health in the Built Environment
Source: Urban Land Institute

ULI’s Building Healthy Places Toolkit: Strategies for Enhancing Health in the Built Environment outlines evidence-supported opportunities for enhancing health outcomes in real estate developments.

Developers, owners, property managers, designers, investors, and others involved in real estate decision making can use the report’s recommendations and strategies to create places that contribute to healthier people and communities, and to enhance and preserve value by meeting growing desires for health-promoting places.

Infrastructure 2014: Shaping the Competitive City

September 22, 2014 Comments off

Infrastructure 2014: Shaping the Competitive City (PDF)
Source: Urban Land Institute

How do real estate developers and investors — who could pursue opportunities regionally, nationally, or internationally—think about infrastructure? How do city leaders use infrastructure investments to position their cities for real estate investment and economic development? What role does infrastructure play relative to other economic development strategies? And are public and private perceptions and priorities aligned—or do they diverge, and in what ways?

To provide answers, researchers for Infrastruc – ture 2014 crafted a series of survey questions and asked high-level public officials and private real estate leaders to weigh in. Nearly 250 public sector leaders in local and regional government and over 200 senior-level private developers, in – vestors, and real estate advisers responded to the survey. About 86 percent of survey respondents were based in the United States, with the balance located in countries across the globe.

Nearly every city aspires to grow, and high- quality infrastructure—infrastructure that is well maintained, reliable, safe, resilient, and customer friendly—contributes to well-functioning, growth-primed cities—cities that attract new residents and retain existing ones.

Infrastructure—the physical facilities and systems that support economic activity—is often seen as a driver of real estate and development, especially by those who are in the business of pro – viding it. But do the people actually building and investing in real estate agree? The Infrastructure 2014 survey tells us “yes”—and a number of other interesting things as well.

Quality of Infrastructure is a Top Deal Maker or Breaker for Real Estate Investment and Development Decisions

April 9, 2014 Comments off

Quality of Infrastructure is a Top Deal Maker or Breaker for Real Estate Investment and Development Decisions
Source: Urban Land Institute

The quality of infrastructure systems – including transportation, utilities, and telecommunications – is a top factor influencing real estate investment and development decisions in cities around the world, sharing a high ranking with consumer demand in terms of importance, according to a survey of public- and private-sector leaders conducted by the Urban Land Institute and EY. The findings are included in the Infrastructure 2014: Shaping the Competitive City report, released this week at ULI’s 2014 Spring Meeting in Vancouver, British Columbia.

The survey, conducted in January 2014, reflects the opinions of 241 public sector officials and 202 senior-level real estate executives (developers, investors, lenders and advisors) based in large and mid-sized cities across the globe, with concentrations in the United States, Europe and Asia Pacific.

Among the combined group of public and private sector participants, 88 percent rated infrastructure quality as the top influencer of real estate investment and development. Demographic forces, including consumer demand and workforce skills, ranked as other top considerations determining real estate investment locations. Infrastructure quality was rated as the highest influencer by public leaders (91 percent) and second to highest by private leaders (86 percent). Consumer demand was viewed as the top factor by the private sector (90 percent).

Strong telecommunications systems (including high-speed internet capability) led the list of infrastructure categories that drive real estate investment, along with good roads, bridges, and reliable and affordable energy.

New ‘Bending the Cost Curve’ Report from ULI and Enterprise, Explores Solutions to Expand the Supply of Affordable Rental Housing

January 17, 2014 Comments off

New ‘Bending the Cost Curve’ Report from ULI and Enterprise, Explores Solutions to Expand the Supply of Affordable Rental Housing
Source: Urban Land Institute

Solutions to increase the supply of affordable rental housing are explored in a new report from the Urban Land Institute’s (ULI) Terwilliger Center for Housing and Enterprise Community Partners, Inc (Enterprise).

Bending the Cost Curve: Solutions to Expand the Supply of Affordable Rentals outlines factors that impede the development of affordable rental housing – causing the supply in many markets to fall far short of the demand – and offers specific, actionable solutions to overcome the barriers.

Nationally, there were only 6.9 million rentals affordable to 11.8 million extremely low-income renters in 2011, a supply gap that grew by three million renters between 2001 and 2011—and continues to grow. “In an era of growing demand and declining government financial support for affordable rental housing, it is more important than ever to deliver affordable housing as effectively as possible,” the report says. “Bending the cost curve will enable developers to deliver additional affordable rental homes and help jurisdictions provide more housing choices, meet the growing need for affordable rentals, and ensure that individuals and families across a range of incomes have a place to call home within the community.”

The report, released today in Washington, D.C. at the ULI/Carolyn and Preston Butcher Forum on Multifamily Housing, is based on a series of interviews and roundtable discussions co-hosted by the Terwilliger Center and Enterprise over the past 16 months with nearly 200 developers, financiers, and policy makers in ten markets – Chicago, Denver, Los Angeles, New York City, San Francisco, Boston, Houston, Minneapolis, Pittsburgh, and Seattle.

Conclusions drawn from the discussions formed the basis for the research, which is intended to help fill the void of material examining how to overcome regulatory barriers to affordable rental development, such as land use, zoning and building code restrictions, processing delays, and financing obstacles.

Strong Real Estate Fundamentals Seen for Asia in 2014, Says Emerging Trends in Real Estate® Asia Pacific 2014; Japan Regains Status As A Magnet For Investment And Development

January 15, 2014 Comments off

Strong Real Estate Fundamentals Seen for Asia in 2014, Says Emerging Trends in Real Estate® Asia Pacific 2014; Japan Regains Status As A Magnet For Investment And Development
Source: Urban Land Institute

Real estate fundamentals are expected to remain strong in markets throughout Asia in 2014, with stiff competition for conventional assets in prime markets boosting the popularity of niche property sectors and secondary markets for investments, according to Emerging Trends in Real Estate® Asia Pacific 2014, a real estate forecast jointly published by the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and PwC.

The report notes that, unlike other asset classes, real estate in Asia “barely flinched” this year in response to the tapering of the U.S. economic stimulus and expectations of higher interest rates. This is due, in part, because of the increase in sovereign wealth and institutional capital being directed to Asian markets, as well as the substantial volume of Asian capital being exported from China, Singapore and South Korea into real estate assets across the region.

Emerging Trends in Real Estate® 2014

November 19, 2013 Comments off

Emerging Trends in Real Estate® 2014 (PDF)
Source: Urban Land Institute and PricewaterhouseCoopers
From press release:

The U.S. real estate recovery is set to continue into 2014, with investors increasingly looking beyond some of the traditionally popular markets to secondary markets in search of higher yields, according to Emerging Trends in Real Estate® 2014, co-published by PwC US and the Urban Land Institute (ULI).

According to real estate market participants, the predicted growth in secondary markets is driven by investors searching for returns as opportunities in core markets become harder to find and the best assets become more expensive. As a result, the report anticipates that 2014 may be the year that many investors who have traditionally focused mainly on large established markets such as Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, New York City, San Francisco and Washington, will be expanding their focus to other cities in order to protect capital. This trend, first noted in last year’s Emerging Trends report, is likely to build substantial momentum next year, given the steady pace of improvement in market fundamentals in secondary markets, and with more investments in those markets meeting investors’ risk/return metrics.

The movement into secondary markets is underpinned by the anticipated increase in both debt and equity capital during 2014. Respondents were particularly positive about the prospects for equity capital from foreign investors, institutional investors and private equity funds, as well as debt from insurance companies, mezzanine lenders, and issuers of commercial mortgage-backed securities.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,052 other followers