Home > National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Research Council > National Disagreement Over NASA’s Goals and Objectives Detrimental to Agency Planning, Budgeting Efforts

National Disagreement Over NASA’s Goals and Objectives Detrimental to Agency Planning, Budgeting Efforts

December 6, 2012

National Disagreement Over NASA’s Goals and Objectives Detrimental to Agency Planning, Budgeting Efforts

Source: National Research Council

Without a national consensus on strategic goals and objectives for NASA, the agency cannot be expected to establish or work toward achieving long-term priorities, says a new report from the National Research Council. In addition, there is a mismatch between the portfolio of programs and activities assigned to the agency and the budget allocated by Congress, and legislative restrictions inhibit NASA from more efficiently managing its personnel and infrastructure. The White House should take the lead in forging a new consensus on NASA’s future in order to more closely align the agency’s budget and objectives and remove restrictions impeding NASA’s efficient operations.

The committee that authored the report was not asked to offer views on what NASA’s goals, objectives, and strategy should be; rather it was tasked with recommending how these goals, objectives, and strategies might best be established and communicated.

The report recommends establishing a national consensus on NASA’s future with the executive branch taking the lead after technical consultations with potential international partners. The strategic goals and objectives chosen should be ambitious yet technically rational and should focus on the long term, the report says.

To reduce the discrepancy between the overall size of NASA’s budget and its current portfolio of missions, facilities, and personnel, the report says, the White House, Congress, and NASA, as appropriate, could pursue any or all of the following four options:

  • Institute an aggressive restructuring program to reduce infrastructure and personnel costs and improve efficiency;
  • Engage in and commit for the long term to more cost-sharing partnerships with other U.S. government agencies, private sector industries, and international partners;
  • Increase the size of the NASA budget;
  • Reduce considerably the size and scope of elements of NASA’s current program portfolio to better fit the current and anticipated budget profile.
About these ads
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 785 other followers

%d bloggers like this: